Is the Encyclopedia Britannica an academic source?
Encyclopedias are considered a scholarly source. The content is written by an academic for an academic audience. While entries are reviewed by an editorial board, they are not peer-reviewed.
Can I cite Encyclopedia Britannica?
Internet. Encyclopedia Britannica. After the article title, include the encyclopedia/dictionary name and italicize it, followed by a period. If an edition is stated, cite it after the encyclopedia/dictionary name, followed by the abbreviation ed. Conclude the citation with the year of publication and a period.
Is Wikipedia as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica?
The journal Nature says the open-access encyclopedia is about as accurate as the old standby. Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world around us, according to a study published this week in the journal Nature.
Can I use Britannica as a source?
No, the Encyclopedia Britannica is a tertiary source. An encyclopedia references information without any analysis or opinion, therefore, it is a tertiary source. Nevertheless, depending on the scope of your research, encyclopedias can be referenced as primary sources.
Is interview primary source or secondary?
Primary sources provide raw information and first-hand evidence. Examples include interview transcripts, statistical data, and works of art. A primary source gives you direct access to the subject of your research. Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers.
What is the main distinction between primary and secondary source?
Primary sources can be described as those sources that are closest to the origin of the information. Secondary sources often use generalizations, analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of primary sources. Examples of secondary sources include textbooks, articles, and reference books.